Bush did not bring more security to Americans. Instead the wolrld now is more insecure and terrorists are gaining ground because of Bushes right wing policy.
In fact Bush is responsible of the killing of more than 1000 American brave soldiers so far. All of whome died just to make Bush and his group wealthier and more powerfull. Liberation of Irak??? what about the distruction instead of liberation of Irak. Well whay not since Bush's associates are going to rebuild Irak( more distruction = more business).

Last time I checked all the terrorist are gathering in one place...Iraq, which makes it easier to round them up or take them out so that could be a flipside to your opinion.

- Grim X

Which last time I checked all Major conflict was done in Afghanistan before the Iraq situation.

Well, supposedly its the same situation in Iraq, and it isn't exactly pacified yet either.

Though your principle goes against World War 2 if you applied your principle to that war.

Well, yeah it sort of does actually.... Germany didn't do too well in fighting on two fronts pretty much alone, did they.

Though last time I checked Australia and Britain (though should not forget Poland) have all committed troops to Iraq, while there is a STRONG German Bundeswehr Force in Afghanistan.

- Grim X

In fact Bush is responsible of the killing of more than 1000 American brave soldiers so far. All of whome died just to make Bush and his group wealthier and more powerfull.

DEATH TO BUSH!!! He is evil as the devil, if not the devil himself. He sent people into Iraq because somehow, hes going to GAIN money!!! Alex, please tell me your ingenius theory on how Bush and his "friends" stand to profit from this war??(im saying profit money wise, we all already know that we will profit from the liberty it ensures and from the terorrism that has been stopped) Really im very interested, because though i've heard many claims, i have yet to see ANY proof of this, in fact i havnt even seen them back it up with opinion, just the claims.

And PS- I usually dont comment on spelling errors, but if you can't spell Iraq by now people are going to question if you really know what you are talking about.

DEATH TO BUSH!!!

OK. Despite my first JU blog -- "DEATH TO CONSERVATIVES" -- I must protest. I've thought about it a lot. The Republic is bigger than George Bush.

Myrrh it was sarcasm, Mitch21 is conservative.

- GX

Heh yeah sorry probably shoulda posted a disclaimer or something

Okay at least I know to avoid this blog. Talk about looney.

right on, apologies.

There are 2 documentary films that give you a precise idea of what is behind the dstruction of Irak: 9/11 and le monde selon Bush.

Please note that the spelling of Irak is correct :

dictionary.com
"
irak

n : a republic in the Middle East in western Asia; the ancient civilization of Mesopotamia was in the area now known as Iraq; modern government is involved in state-sponsored terrorism [syn: Iraq, Republic of Iraq, Al-Iraq, Irak]"

There are lots of govenments and dictators who sponsor terrorism. none of them is worth the lives of 1000 brave american soldiers.
Terrorism was never the purpose of destroying Iraq. it money and ...

If you are basing everything you believe about these two candidates on two documentaries you watched, you need to take some time to find other sources. Just because it is on film or in a "documentary" doesn't mean it is accurate.

Reply #42 By: Alex (Anonymous) - 10/14/2004 3:39:56 AM There are lots of govenments and dictators who sponsor terrorism. none of them is worth the lives of 1000 brave american soldiers. Terrorism was never the purpose of destroying Iraq. it money and ...

Your talking out your ear, cause your mouth be knowing better.

Oh shit. Alison, there's been a major screw up. Someone forgot to give you the cheat sheet for discussions here:

Free Republic: Reasonable. Democratic Underground: Whacked Out, Man!